PERKEMBANGAN ILMU USHUL FIQH PASCA IMAM MADZHAB HINGGA ABAD MODERN (Kajian Terhadap Metode Ijtihad dan Penerapannya)
Keywords:
Ijtihad, Ushul Fiqh, ModernAbstract
The purpose of this writing is to describe the description of the activities of ijtihad of the mujtahids in the post-Imams era and also in the modern era in solving problems that arose in that era. The method used in this paper is the literature study method. The results of the study indicate that, the period after the Imam's school of worship is called the taqlid, jumud or vacuum period. However, this does not mean that the activities of ijtihad were stopped altogether. At this time the activities of ijtihad can be seen from the gathering of the ideas of Islamic scholars, comparing the opinions of the Imams of madzahb to take the opinion that is considered the most powerful, formulating the basis of the footing and methods of ushuliyah which form the basis of ijtihad and fatwa of the Imams of the school of thought, both in the form of sharia (( شرح , hasyiah ( حشيه ) or in the form of khulashah. The revival or modern era began around 1800 AD. In this period, Islamic thinkers tried to reconstruct the ushul fiqh methodology that had previously been built by the Imam of the school of thought) The reason is that the methods of the Imam of the school are less relevant in answering the problems that arise, given the increasingly complex problems.
References
Abidin, Zainal, Corak Pemikiran Dan Metode Ijtihad Ibn Taimiyah, Jurnal Millah, Edisi
Desember 2010
Al-Alwani, Taha Jabir, Source Methodology in Islamic Jurisprudence, terj. Yokyakarat: UII
Press, 2001.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid, al-Mustasfa fi ‘Ilm al-Ushul, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1993.
Al-Khallaf, Abdul Wahab, ‘Ilmu Ushul al-Fiqh, Kuwait: Dar al-Qalam, 1978.
_____________, Khulasoh Tarikh at-Tasyri’ al-Islami, Jakarta: Majelis A’la al-Indonesia li
ad-Da’wah al-Islamiyah, t.th.
Amal, Taufik Adnan, Islam dan Tantangan Modernitas: Studi atas Pemikiran Hukum Fazlur
Rahman, Bandung:Mizan, 1996.
At-Turabi, Hasan. Pembaharuan Ushul Fiqh, Bandung: Pustaka, 1980.
Az-Zhahiri, Ibn Hazm, al-Ihkam fi Ushul al-Ahkam, juz 1, 2dan 5, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-
‘Ilmiyah,t.th.
Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, dkk, Ensiklopedia Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve,
Fanani, Muhyar, Metode Studi Islam Aplikasi Sosiologi Pengetahuan Sebagai Cara
Pandang, Yokyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.
Hallaq, Wael B., A History of Islamic Legal Theories, terj. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2000.
Iqbal, Muhammad. The Reconstruction of ReligiousThought in Islam. Lahore: Javid Igbal,
Ismail, Ahmad Syarqawi, Rekonstruksi Konsep Wahyu Muhammad Syahrur, cet. I,
Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press, 2003.
Mustaqim, Abdul, Efistemologi Tafsir Konemporer, Yogyakarta:LkiS, 2010.
Nadjib, Agus Moh., ‚As-Sunnah Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam dalam Pandangan
Muhammad Syahrur‛ Jurnal Penelitian Agama, Vol. XI, No. 2 Mei-Agustus 2002
Qaradawi, Yusuf, al-Ijtihad al-Ma'ashir baina al-Indhibath wa al-Infirath, terj. Kairo: Dar atTauzi’i wa Nasyr al-Islamiyah, 1994.
_______________, Fatwa-Fatwa Kontemporer, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.
Qasim, Abdurrahman bin Muhammad bin, Majmu’ al-Fatawa Ibn Taimiyah, Madinah
Munawwarah, 2004.
Saleh, Ahmad Syukri, Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qurani Kontemporer Dalam Pandangan Fazlur
Rahman, Jakarta: GP Press, 2007.
Shahrur, Muhammad, al-Kitab wa al- Qur’an: Qira’ah al-Mu’ashirah, Damaskus: al-Hali li
ath-Thiba’ah wa an-Nasyr wa at-Tauzi’, 1992.
_______________, Dirasat Islamiyyah Mu’ashirah fi al Daulah wa al Mujtama’, Damaskus:
al-Hali li ath-Thiba’ah wa an-Nasyr wa at-Tauzi’, 1994.
Shahrur, Muhammad, Nahw Ushul Jadidah li al-Fiqh al-Islami,terj. Yokyakarta: Kalimedia,
Siregar, Amir, Metode Zahiri Dalam pembentukan Sumber Hukum Islam, Yokyakarta:
Belukar, 2009.
Sirry, Mun’im A., Sejarah Fiqh Islam Sebuah Pengantar, Surabaya: Risalah Gusti, 1996.
Zuhri, Muh., Hukum Islam dalam Lintasan Sejarah, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
